OPEC DECISION HIGHLIGHTS ALIGNMENT FROM SAUDI ARABIA TO RUSSIA The threat of a motion of censure indeed hovers over the pension reform currently in consultation.
If the motion is passed, the text is rejected and the government overthrown, but this scenario seems unlikely.īut nothing indicates that these oppositions could not join forces in the future. However, if the RN and the Nupes are going to table a motion of censure, the two groups should stay in their lane and not vote for the provision of the other.
With the current composition of the hemicycle, this would amount to an alliance between the party Les Républicains (LR), the National Rally (RN) and the New Popular Ecological and Social Union (Nupes).
Oppositions divided on a motion of censure To be adopted, a motion of censure requires the votes of the majority of the members of the Assembly. It therefore seems unlikely that the Prime Minister will manage to pass all of her bills without a hitch. The last legislative elections only gave it a relative majority. A Republican amendment restoring the "exit tax" was also voted against the government's opinion.Įlisabeth Borne, should be brought to use it regularly. The deputies, including some members of Renaissance, notably approved a tax on super-dividends proposed by the president of the MoDem group, Jean-Paul Mattei. Several amendments, voted against the opinion of the executive, could thus jump. The Prime Minister had an absolute majority but the opposition, in particular La France insoumise, had tabled a very large number of amendments with the aim of obstructing the text. During Emmanuel Macron's first five-year term (2017-2022), only one use was identified, by Édouard Philippe, in 2020, on pension reform. Conversely, in the event of an absolute and comfortable majority, there is no need for the government, most of the time, to use 49-3. It allows not only to reject the adoption of the bill, but also to overthrow the government.Ĥ9.3 is a constitutional weapon available to the government which allows a "forced passage" when its majority in the National Assembly is narrow, even relative. In the National Assembly, there is nevertheless, for the opposition, a device to thwart the executive: the motion of censure. The 2023 budget is then examined in the Senate. This article allows him to adopt his text without going through the vote of the deputies in the National Assembly. The government of Elisabeth Borne, which does not have an absolute majority in the National Assembly to vote for its finance bill, can therefore adopt it despite everything by drawing 49.3. The Prime Minister may, in addition, have recourse to this procedure for another project or a bill per session." In this case, this bill is considered as adopted, unless a motion of censure, tabled within the following twenty-four hours, is voted under the conditions provided for in the preceding paragraph. "The Prime Minister may, after deliberation by the Council of Ministers, engage the government's responsibility before the National Assembly on the vote on a Finance or Social Security Financing bill. These tools, such as the requisition, must be used with caution", has she added.Īrticle 49 paragraph 3 of the French Constitution allows the government to have a text adopted without a vote of Parliament. However, "we must give the debate a chance, especially since the French do not like 49.3 very much. The blockage does not come from us, and you have shown it well”, declared the Prime Minister, Élisabeth Borne, during a meeting, Tuesday morning, with the deputies Renaissance The group presidents said from the start that they would not vote for the finance bill. We had pushed for it to go faster, the government has chosen to go all the way", confides a Renaissance leader.īut Elisabeth Borne opted for negotiation before the forced passage. "We are the ones in the arena and we don't want to turn ourselves into punching bags. Several Majority heavyweights have been pushing for the 49.3 to be instigated as soon as possible.
The use of 49.3 will be "probably for tomorrow", Wednesday, the last day of examination of the expenditure part of the PLF, he assured. Tuesday, October 18, the government spokesman, Olivier Véran, put an end to the suspense: MPs knew the executive would use it, but were waiting to find out when. The ax of 49.3 has been on everyone's mind since the start of the examination of the Finance Bill (PLF) for 2023 in the National Assembly. FRANCE THE SECTION 49.3 CLEAVER FOR THE BUDGET
0 kommentar(er)
